Rick,
It sounds like you might have your speech compressor turned on. First turn
off the compressor and then set your mic gain at about 20 percent and you
should be good with the mic amp on.
73
Bob Tinney, K8LR, [log in to unmask]
Skype, bobtinn
Life is full of challenges, that's what makes it interesting!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Bob Tinney" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
I cant seem to find the right setting for me.
Without the preamp my audio seems to low for me unless I practically eat the
mic, and if I'm gonna do that I might as well use a hand mic., and with the
preamp on I get to much background noise unless I turn the mic gain almost
completely off, and then my audio is to low again.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Tinney" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
> As I said in my previous post on this subject, if the mic amp is on, the
> TS2000 mic gain should be reduced, but the mic's amp in the mic will give
> better vox control. If you just turn on the mic's amp, you'll be
> overdriving the rig unless you turn down the mic gain. In my opinion,
> there
> is no difference between the amp being on or off as long as you adjust the
> mic gain properly.
>
> Bob Tinney, K8LR, [log in to unmask]
> Skype, bobtinn
> Life is full of challenges, that's what makes it interesting!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
>
>
> I think so too, John. It's cleaner to my ear without it. Lou
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 4:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
>
>
>>I even think the mic sounds distinctly better without the preamp on. Even
>> without the RF and all, I think the tone is a bit better.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 6:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
>>
>>
>>> Quite so, John. If you listen to the rig with and without the preamp,
>>> the
>>> difference is profound. As I said before, I've yet to see a rig on
>>> which
>>> it
>>> would improve things. and I agree with your statement concerning RF.
>>> The
>>> MC60 has enough RF problems as it is without introducing more. Lou
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 6:25 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I've seen that preamp as nothing but a direct cause of RF feedback, I
>>>> used
>>>> to use it on my TS-440 before I knew better but now would never use it
>>>> for
>>>> anything.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 6:02 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I use that mic on the TS440 and I keep the preamp off. I've yet to see
>>>>>a
>>>>> situation where the pramp improved things. I doubt that the 2000
>>>>> needs
>>>>> it.
>>>>> If it's working now, I'd leave it off. The 440 does provide power for
>>>>> it
>>>>> and perhaps the 2000 does too. On my model, there is an on-off switch
>>>>> for
>>>>> the preamp on the bottom of the stand. lou
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Rick" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 1:24 PM
>>>>> Subject: Kenwood TS-2000 and MC-60A.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi list.
>>>>>> I've been using the MC-60A on the TS-2000 without batteries, I was =
>>>>>> wondering if the mic needs the batteries, or if it draws power from
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> =
>>>>>> radio for the preamp.
>>>>>> Thanks in advance for any help, and 7 3.
|
