Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:21:19 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From several of the reviews I read, that receiver has a problem with
overload.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Dyer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 6:31 AM
Subject: Re: vr-500
> interestingly enough, that receiver appears in both the receivers general
> coverage, and the receivers scanners catagories, mixxed reviews in both,
> dd.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:23 AM
> Subject: Re: vr-500
>
>
>> Did you check the reviews at
>> http://www.eham.net
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:08 AM
>> Subject: vr-500
>>
>>
>>>I went to aes yesterday and spent my Christmas money and bought a vr-500.
>>> At first look, it seems fairly usable from the keyboard, I've figured
>>> out
>>> how to change modes, and write to memory. Seems fairly sensitive,
>>> although i wonder what the duck that comes with it is optimized for. If
>>> I
>>> go to th weather channel, I get a better signal if I curl my fingers
>>> around the antenna. Anyone else on list got any comments or experience
>>> with this thing?
>>> 73
>>> Butch Bussen
>>> wa0vjr
>>> open Node 3148
>>> Las Vegas
|
|
|