When William says things like “... my objection to evolution - that
since there is no evidence to its truth, it is necessarily
faith-based...” this sort of crack could be tolerated if it were only
occasionally posted, but when this kind of thing dominates the digest,
as it has been doing--and is also done to provoke--then for me at
least it makes the digest a pain to read. I suppose that means that I
should not read the digest.

Ken