<<Disclaimer:  Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>
 
>Things may be stricter in the US, but I know of one church, here, where rice
>crackers may be used as a substitute for the unleavened bread.  In fact, I
>cannot think of any valid reason why all communion hosts could not be made of
>gluten-free bread; while this would matter little to non-celiacs, celiacs
>would be spared the unhappiness they experience when they are denied access to
>one of the most important sacraments.  Someone should point this out to those
>who make the rules in the Church.
 
It is my understanding from the San Diego Diocese that the host must have a
small portion of wheat or wheat starch. (See recipe from the American
Celiac Society in previous posts.)  Since this is unacceptable to us we may
receive only the wine at communion (check to see if the host is dipped in
the wine).  Each church must (according to the diocese) make accomodations
for the celiac to receive wine. However, if this is not possible because
you are visiting a new church that is unfamiliar with your dietary needs,
then not receiving communion (the host or the wine) is understandable
within the Catholic Church.  In this case you are still receiving the
sacrament by attending mass.
 
I wouldn't plan on changing the church's ways.  They've researched this and
have their own reasons.  However, as you probaby know, most churches vary
in the degree they follow the diocese rules.  Some churches in the US do
use rice cakes, but this is a decision that needs to be talked about with
your local church.
 
Judee De Jaco