BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kris Hickerson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kris Hickerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:58:48 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
Hi All,  Well, Tom, I can do pretty good on 17 I think, so am looking 
forward to trying that next weekend.  I got unexpected out of town company 
yesterday afternoon, a cousin that I haven't seen in over a year, so did not 
get a chance to join you.  Hope to make it this Sunday.

73
Kris
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: some thoughts on 17 meters for next week's net


    Wondered where you went, Glenn, but I guess what you describe is the
nature of the beast.

You were sure loud here too when you checked in--probably the best I ever
heard you!

The fact that you couldn't hear Kevin is really surprising!

Anyway, we'll give it a go on 17 next week, and see what that brings.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Schroeder" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: some thoughts on 17 meters for next week's net


Hi Tom and all.

Whenj I checked into the net Tom was as loud as I ever heard him, but I
couldn't hear Kevin this week.  I heard Jerry near you Tom and the three
district one stations really loud and then someone turned it back to you Tom
and I never heard you again.  I listened for a while but heard no one.  The
band just went bye bye.

I guess 18160 sounds as good as any.  I do pretty well on 17.

73  Glen
ka9yiu


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 5:20 PM
Subject: some thoughts on 17 meters for next week's net


> Hi, all.
>
> Well, the net was its usual success on 20 meters today, despite some very
> anoying QRM, and despite the fact that the band started to give out for
> our
> East Coast folks toward the end of the hour.
>
> Shortly after the net, a couple of us agreed to go up to 17 meters, and
> see
> what it was like up there.
>
> I never heard Kevin (K7RX), but did hear Betsey (K1EIC), and Gerry
> (WB6IVF).
> If anyone else was in there, I did not hear you, so I apologize.  Please
> don't think I was ignoring you (grin).
>
> I was able to tune my Ameritron AL811H amplifier on 17 meters, and
> actually
> got good signal reports from Gerry and Betsey.  However, for some reason,
> running 500 watts or so on 17 meters creates RFI problems by setting off
> several smoke detectors, so I probably shouldn't volunteer to be net
> control
> for next week-end's net, if we decide to try 17 meters.  I certainly can
> serve as a relay station, though, and will contribute whatever else I can
> to
> the net, even if I have to run 100 watts.  (Yeah, I know, Kevin, that
> ground
> rod will really help!  (smile)
>
> Given that 18.1575 is the HF backpackers' standard calling frequency, we
> probably would be best off going to 18.160.
>
> How does this all sound as a plan?
>
> P.S.  Toward the beginning of today's net, Steve (WA1RTB), Howard
> (WA9TOP),
> and Steve (KW3A) were louder than I have ever heard them, so 20 meters is
> definitely my  band of choice for any future nets beyond next Sunday, at
> least for a while.)
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ, Louisville, CO 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2