Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 29 May 2010 16:06:24 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That's whre I disagree. The ham thng in the convention is hudge and all of us agree that all rados should be made accessibal to a point. I don't want everythig spoken as that would drive me nuts but at least the freq and menues and mode spoken.
Take care all.
On May 29, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Eric Clegg wrote:
> Hi Maurice,
> I agree that a set of specifications viz a vis accessibility would have to
> be worked out.
>
> I also feel that both groups the ACB anf NFB could get together to hash out
> what needs to be done.
>
> I have noticed on both groups lists particularly the amateur radio lists
> politeness and cooperativeness rules.
>
> Oh by the way will you be coming to the Braille Research In the Rockies
> conference in Denver the weekend of June 10 thru 12, 2010.
>
> Can you recommend any repeaters in Denver I might try?
>
> 73,
>
> Eric Clegg
> KU3I
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5154 (20100528) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
|
|
|