I'm not sure what it is or where I got it, someone sent me the link to it
and I'm not home or I'd be able to check it for you but there are presets in
the program to widen out there radio and all,makes a real difference.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: R-2000
> John,
>
> What program do you use to control your 2000?
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 08:12
> Subject: Re: R-2000
>
>
>> the fact you're listening on a computer is your whole problem. There are
>>> audio settings coming in to play there so you have no clue what you
>>> sound
>>> like, and the stock mics on the newer kenwood radios sound like pure
>>> crap
>>> always. The TS-2000 is one of the best sounding radios out there and it
>>> doesn't take much of a mic to get the good sound out of it. I actually
>>> got
>>> a program to alter the user setting on the EQ which I like for the
>>> receive
>>> but actually lately what I've run is the MC-60 or a shore 526 mic, with
>>> the radio on the conventional setting and people say I sound the best I
>>> ever have. The TS-480 sounds alright but I've never heard one with stock
>>> settings I cared for, you can mess with the user setting though and
>>> customize it and actually widen the radio out a little like you can with
>>> the TS-2000 and make it sound good but it just won't have the fidelity.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:58 PM
>>> Subject: Re: R-2000
>>>
>>>
>>>> does the 480 have better tx equalization options than the ts2000?
>>>> the 2000 just has the presets which all sound pretty crappy to me and a
>>>> bunch of guys that I did in depth tests with...i had them all record my
>>>> audio direct into a computer with no equalization on their received
>>>> audio
>>>> and in wav format...and then emailed to me.
>>>> I found that the only setting that sounded good with any microphone I
>>>> tried
>>>> was the default or off setting...the rest just seemed to lack
>>>> something.
>>>> I
>>>> tried the stock microphone, the MC47, turner plus3, a shur sm58, shur
>>>> SM858B
>>>> and a couple other dynamic studio microphones.
>>>> I did download a program once where you could get into the "User"
>>>> settings
>>>> of the tx eq on the 2000, but the software was very unscreen reader
>>>> friendly
>>>> and I couldn't taylor the audio...it was a 7 band eq with shelving
>>>> filters
>>>> and all sorts of stuff, but sadly unusable by me.
>>>> So perhaps the presets or tx audio EQ in the 480 are better than the
>>>> ts2000's presets.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Colin, V A6BKX
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 6:02 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: R-2000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Lou,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tnx and I'll let you know. I'd be interested in getting the TX EQ
>>>>> sound
>>>>> as
>>>>> good as possible. I have several options to choose from and while
>>>>> the
>>>>> TX
>>>>> monitor is nice, it doesn't really tell what the other guy hears.
>>>>> My
>>>>> brother was just here and installed the voice thing for me. Next time
>>>>> he
>>>>> is
>>>>> here we will get the filters installed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just got a card from an OO, which I wasn't too happy about, until I
>>>>> found
>>>>> it was a "Good Operator Report" with compliments on my signal and
>>>>> operating
>>>>> skills in the WPX SSB a few weeks ago. That 2000 has always sounded
>>>>> super
>>>>> on the air and I'd like to get the 480 at least in the same ball park.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:53 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: R-2000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've always pounded in here on 40 and especially 80. If you need
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> audio
>>>>>> report or evaluation with that thing, let me know and we can get on
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> time. Congrats and good luck with it. Lou
>>>
>>
|
