BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Date:
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:29:15 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<A2F542BBE4994AEDB16693E0909D9812@x24200>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Howard Kaufman <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 lines)
Fred, before you look at that, the question is the computer seeing the 
wireless signal.  If the quality is good when you scan for wireless 
networks, then the problem is somewhere else.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2