Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:47:59 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
<4A90F2A81AF54E319CDD8556842AE270@Strudelmeyer> |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ed,
If you're looking for accessibility, you can't beat the 480. I have both
the 480 and the 2000, and if the 480 is a 9 on a scale of 1 to 10 for
accessibility, the 2000 is about a 7. Re: selectivity, the 2000 wins hands
down because of the IF DSP, especially on SSB. Re: sensitivity, I think the
two radios are fairly comparable, but I've never compared them head to head.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 14:44
Subject: T S 2000
>I was wondering how satisfied owners are with this rig along side of others
> they have used? Selectivity, sensitivity and such, I hear the
> accessibility is good.
> I have a 480 so am somewhat familiar with this particular rig. Thanks
> and
> 73. Ed K7UC
>
|
|
|