BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:21:57 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
RX difference between TS-480 and TS-2000?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<052401cad02d$80485450$5d64ccd1@kw3a>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
steve <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Just wondering if anyone has done a side by side  comparison of the TS-2000 
and the TS-480 on receive? I would like to get another HF rig in the shack. 
I'm willing to sacrifice some performance in favor of accessibility inherent 
with Kenwood, since I have no sighted  help here.  Rumors still abound of 
Kenwood debuting a new HF rig at Dayton in May,  but even if true, not sure 
I would want to be the first in line for a new model.

I know the 480 requires optional filters, but is the 480 a noticeable 
improvement  on  rx?

73, Steve KW3A

ATOM RSS1 RSS2