BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Too Much QRN
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:31:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (114 lines) 
And that's precisely why I chose that one, Tom.  I guess we'll have to 
monitor it this week and see what if anything is there regularly.  Fun 
stuff, though.  Should be nicer once the QRN settles down.  Lou
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Too Much QRN


>    I'm cool with 7.190, since, as I understand, it's still within the
> General class portion of the band.  I just don't want to exclude anyone if
> at all possible.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
>
>
> Excellent point, Steve.  I'm thinking 7.190 or thereabouts might be worth
> trying.  I heard the majority of stations but with weak sigs and lots of
> QRN. Lou
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 9:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
>
>
>> Junior,
>>
>> I had to step out of the shack for the last 20 minutes or so and came 
>> back
>> just around the top of the hour.  I heard you trying to call Tom to check
>> in.  I tried to relay, but just then the BC station came up very loud and
>> I
>> don't know if Tom heard me or not.
>>
>> BTW, Fred and Gary: You guys were loud near Philly.
>>
>> I'd be willing to try 20 some time.  If we do it again on 40, I hope we
>> aren't married to that frequency.    There are no BC stations  below 
>> 7200,
>> Generals can go as low as 7.175, and that portion of the band just seems
>> quieter.
>>
>> 73, Steve KW3A
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Junior Lolley" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
>>
>>
>>>I was hearing quite a few stations on the net but no one could hear me.
>>> Tom kb8tyj was the loudest here in Florida.
>>>
>>>
>>> Junior Lolley KG4ITD Liberty County E. C.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of Steve Forst
>>> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:26 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
>>>
>>> still on Butch.    Band is noisy  and most signals are poor.
>>>
>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:19 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Too Much QRN
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anyone still on?  Not hearing much here in Vegas.
>>>> 73
>>>> Butch Bussen
>>>> wa0vjr
>>>> open Node 3148
>>>> Las Vegas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> xdqOn Sun, 27 Sep 2009,
>>>> Bo Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I could copy only one station here in Baltimore.  He is in Texas.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>> Bob
>>>>>
>>>>> EchoLink Node - 55127
>>>>> Please visit http://www.wan-leatonks.net.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>>> Virus Database (VPS): 090927-0, 09/27/2009
>>> Tested on: 9/27/2009 8:41:10 PM
>>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.
>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2