BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Blind accessible cell phones
From:
Andy Baracco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:38:07 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
At least here in California, Verizon's coverage is vastly superior to AT&T.
Andy
At 06:18 AM 9/5/2009, you wrote:
>That's right! A T and T does have some very user friendly cell phones!  I
>know a couple one is a partial and the other is a total, and their phones
>are great.  However, A T and T and L G do not use the same models.  Some
>kind of reason that I do not remember are never knew.  A T and T would have
>been my other choice, but more people that I talk to by Cell use Verizon.
>Richard KF5UB

ATOM RSS1 RSS2