PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Lendrim <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:07:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Hi Joyce,
I would guess that the word "accelerated" is just a marketing term of no
importance.
I recall using telephone modems in the early days and a lot of frustation
was involved. Various companies were pushing their own technologies and a
universal standard did not exist. Eventually the V.90 standard came into use
and that made things much better. My problems ended when I got a US Robotics
V.90 external modem. I think the model number was 5686. The later V.92
standard made some small changes and may upload a little faster. USR
externals are still available new for about $100 and on Ebay for much less.
There may be other brands that work as well, but the USR externals are
plentiful and work very well. I wouldn't use any modem unless it complied
with V.90 or V.92. Don't pay attention to "56K", or other useless labels
unless it also says V.90 or V.92. I don't know if internal V.90/V.92 models
(which fit in a PCI slot) are as good as the larger external models. There
used to be "software" internal modems, which were cheaper and not as good as
"hardware" modems like the USR external models. Based on my previous
experience, I would avoid them.

Back in the day, The BEST WEB SITE FOR INFO WAS 56K.COM. It is still there
but hasn't been used as much since broadband came into use. I would look
there first for help and technical info, A lot of the info predates V.90, so
be careful what you use. Previous, outdated standards could be K56Flex, X2,
etc.

A good quality (quiet) phone line is important for high connect speeds. If
you search around you can find ways to "listen" to your line. I used to have
software that would quantitatively measure the quality of a line, and I
could print a report. That helped me to get action from the linemen. They
can "switch pairs" in the neighborhood if they are willing to help. If you
have two lines in your house, use the quietest one for the modem. If you
have trouble using the house wiring, test the computer/modem by using the
outside phone line interface. If it works OK outside, the problem may be in
the house wiring. You can run direct lines, bypassing poor lines.

It used to be very common to see connections reported incorrectly as "56k".
Modems will never run at a perfect 56000. I seem to recall about 52000 as
the best theoretical speed available. I had to see a specific number, such
as 49,333 in order to know the true connect speed. My goal would be to get a
number above 40000 as close to 50000 as possible. It may be a little
different each time it connects. If you listen to the sounds as it
negotiates a connection, you may be able to draw some conclusions.

Both of the modems you mentioned appear to be internal modems which would
fit in an empty PCI slot, but they may be external. Looks like they both
claim V.92 compatibity. You'll need a software driver for them which works
with Vista. Getting a driver can be a hassle. The driver may be provided on
a CD, may be available on the mfrs web site, or Windows may already have a
built-in driver for it. If the modem is old, there may not be a driver made
for Vista. I looked at USR.com and they claim the USR externals can be used
with Win95 thru Win7. I would be looking for one of them on Ebay, but you
could try either or both of your existing modems first. Most of this is from
my old memory, but should work OK. I doubt if telephone modem technology has
changed much lately.  Good luck.

 Joyce wrote:
>
> > Now my question: do those 'accelerated' phone modems really work for a
> bit
> > higher-speed connection? (Best I can get out of my old one is 52 K.
> > -- please don't scream! LOL) I have my choice of installing a Best Data
> > 56K V.92/V.44 Windows Internal Modem -- or a Diamond SupraMax LE 56K PCI
> Fax
> > Modem which claims 'faster Internet Connections.' Both are new in box,
> > never opened. Whichever one I install, I can begin using the newer
> computer
> > > and 'retire' this one (my same old eMachines, Windows XP
> > SP3) to recipes and whatnot. Thanks in advance for any help here.
>
>

         PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
                     visit our download web page at:
                  http://freepctech.com/downloads.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2