BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:35:50 -0400
text/plain (80 lines)
    Dave:

I currently have a Windom that was made for me last Fall here in Michigan. 
The problem is that I think it'll be too big for the lot of the new house 
we'll be renting in Colorado. ... I'm donating that Windom to an EOC in a 
neighboring county. ... They will find it quite useful, since the SWR is 
virtually flat on most of the 75-80 meter band.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David R. Basden" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: Alpha Delta DXCC VS. B and W D-90?


Hi Tom,

As long as you are still in the looking stage, take a peak at the
Carolina Windom made by Radio Works:

http://www.RadioWorks.Com               That's what I am seriously
considering for low band coverage to supplement my quad.

73,

Dave, W7OQ


At 05:18 PM 6/29/2009, you wrote:

>--=======AVGMAIL-4DF8363F=======
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>     Howard:
>
>Well, because of what you and others are saying, including quite a few less
>than positive reviews of the B and W on e ham, I am now leaning toward the
>Alpha Delta DXCC.  I also am looking at the Cobra Light line of antennas,
>although I think they might be a bit long for the property lot we'll be
>renting out in Colorado.
>
>Will keep you posted.
>
>73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:01 AM
>Subject: Re: Alpha Delta DXCC VS. B and W D-90?
>
>
>Tom I have used the Alpha Delta at field day and it is very good.  Just run
>a wire from the center to ground, if the model you have requires that.  I
>have also had the B&w, and it is a terrible antenna, on 80 meters.  Most of
>the power is absorbed rather than radiated.  Who cares if you see a flat
>SWR, you see one on a dummy load as well.  How well does that radiate?
>
>--=======AVGMAIL-4DF8363F=======
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="=======AVGMAIL-012C4CD0======="
>
>--=======AVGMAIL-012C4CD0=======
>Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Description: "AVG certification"
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.94/2208 - Release Date: 06/29/09 
>0=
>5:54:00
>
>--=======AVGMAIL-012C4CD0=======--
>--=======AVGMAIL-4DF8363F=======--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2