 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 12 May 2009 22:09:41 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Keith Thomas wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:45, Wiley Long wrote:
>
> I'm not supporting Wrangham, but I do get disappointed by
> people who argue solely on the basis of their prejudices
> (that is, judging a book's arguments and evidence prior to
> reading the book).
How do we discriminate between buying a book worth reading and the usual
drivel? I read the reviews, there are other ways.
> I notice praise for the book by Edward Wilson and Matt Ridley.
> These two know more about human evolution than I will ever
> know - or could even understand. With their praise, I'm prepared
> to read "Catching Fire" with an open mind.
Believers in the hypothesis of evolution? Has someone found the "missing
Link"?
I live much better without any carbohydrates than before, so do others,
and cooked meat makes me sick. This might be a result of some mysterious
modern disease, but it is still evidence.
William
|
|
|
