Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:01:28 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tnx Anthony. While it may not have been clear in my post, I have had a
2000 for almost 9 years. Lots 'o QSO's in the log and I plan to keep it
till it goes to that big ham shack in the sky. Just considering adding a
second rig to the shack with a little better RX specs.
73, Steve KW3A
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: RX difference between TS-480 and TS-2000?
> HiSteve;
> I had both of those radios and I preferred the 2000.
> Anthony
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 1:21 PM, steve <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Just wondering if anyone has done a side by side comparison of the
>> TS-2000
>> and the TS-480 on receive? I would like to get another HF rig in the
>> shack.
>> I'm willing to sacrifice some performance in favor of accessibility
>> inherent
>> with Kenwood, since I have no sighted help here. Rumors still
>> abound of
>> Kenwood debuting a new HF rig at Dayton in May, but even if true,
>> not sure
>> I would want to be the first in line for a new model.
>>
>> I know the 480 requires optional filters, but is the 480 a noticeable
>> improvement on rx?
>>
>> 73, Steve KW3A
>
|
|
|