BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: clear channel stations, digital AM, and such
From:
"ray t. mahorney" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ray t. mahorney
Date:
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:13:29 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
AM stereo might have survived had the FCC endorsed a standard there were 
three standards at the time but the FCC left the decision of which standard 
to adopt to the manufacturers and I think AM stereo died for that reason.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Marthouse" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "ray t. mahorney" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: clear channel stations, digital AM, and such


In my opinion a more technically correct name should be ibac (in band
adjacent channels).  It'll go the way of am stereo in the 80's.

Dave Marthouse N2AAM
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2