BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:19:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
    Maurice:

Well, I went to the Verizon store in West Minster, CO today, and ended up 
with the 8560, which was suggested by, I think, Harvey on the list.

So far, so good, and it's a heck of a lot better here in Louisville, CO than 
my trac fone was.

Will see how things work out through time.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Maurice Mines" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: blind accessible cell phones


hi I live in northen Colorado and jest switeched from att to sprient
and things seem to better with sprint thin I had with att on the unc
campus and I am getting usto my htc snap with moblespeak smartphone I
got a htc snap. just my two bitts worth maurice ham call sine kd0iko.
On Sep 5, 2009, at 8:23 AM, T Behler wrote:

>    Well, it's going to be interesting trying to decide what to do
> with all
> the options out there, but one thing I know is that we have to do
> something
> pretty soon since our trac fone service out here is so bad.
>
> Will keep you posted.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colleen Roth" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 4:03 AM
> Subject: Re: blind accessible cell phones
>
>
> Hi Tom,
> I had Verizon with an LG Phone.  I switched to Att and have a
> Pantec Phone.  I love it.
> I had the n82 Phone and didn't like it.
> I used that with ATT.
> Good luck finding a phone you like.  Jitterbug isn't really that
> great because the plans are not reasonabbby priced.
> Colleen, n8mentnv;

ATOM RSS1 RSS2