At first I thought it was some sort of HF remote. They really are misleading 
since that's the game they're playing. I think it confuses quite a few 
people until they try it. I think if they're going to charge for it they 
should just say it's virtual HF--not real. Otherwise if you want to pay for 
using a VOIP cliental, well I guess!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?


Thanks, John. ... I too prefer real radio, but I just wasn't totally sure
what it was.

To heach his/her own, I guess.  (grin)

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?


I can already hear John Miller on this one, and in this case, I have
to agree. Worked DX? Hardly. HF bands? Not. There's no radio. No
radio, no propagation, no bands. It's VOIP dressed up like a radio. No
radio on *either* end of the connection. And to add insult to injury,
you get to pay for the privilege of playng in the CQ100 sandbox. No
thanks!

On Apr 17, 2009, at 8:12 PM, T Behler wrote:

> Hi, all.
>
> The following thoughts are from a blind friend I have who isn't
> subscribed
> to the list, but who is an active ham nonetheless.
>
> He mentions something called CQ100.
>
> I've never heard of it, and wonder if anyone else has.
>
> Here's what he says about it:
>
>
> Hi Tom,
> I have got a place for the blind hams net.
> What about using cq100?
> You get all 5 hf bands, 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters.  No qrm, and
> no sun
> spots to worry about.
> I worked all over north America and dx on 20, and 40, using it.
> You and everybody can find it at
>
>
> http://www.qsonet.com
>
>
> 73 de WD8OEP

--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Phone: (814) 746-4127 or 888-75-BUDDY
Create your own economic stimulus package:
http://www.powermall.info