BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:01:04 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (163 lines)
    I agree, John, and once we can get clarification as to whether Generals 
can go down there, we just need to set the time.

And, I do think that someone with more power than just 100 watts like I have 
should try to do net control, at least until we figure out what works best 
for most people.

Then, maybe I can do net control later on in the future if I can hear most 
people.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: bh net


> Go below 87200 you should be pretty good. I think generals can go below
> there now if I'm not mistaken. I really haven't kept track of it after the
> change a couple years ago because it didn't affect me so should double 
> check
> that but if we can all go down there with out hurting anyone, I'd say 
> that's
> a good place to look.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 8:35 AM
> Subject: Re: bh net
>
>
>>    I agree, Steve. ...  I guess we can try 40, and then fine tune it from
>> there.
>>
>> Maybe we could start with the 2300 Z time, next Sunday.  I'm not sure of
>> the
>> best frequency, though, since we may have to work around foreign 
>> broadcast
>> stations.
>>
>> Let's see what the others think.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 10:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: bh net
>>
>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> In my opinion, weekends are the most practical time, especially if you
>>> consider that our group covers more than one time zone.  Not sure what
>>> happens to 40 as the evening progresses, but it's certainly worth a try.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 21:06
>>> Subject: Re: bh net
>>>
>>>
>>>>    Well, if someone wants to come up with a time and date, let's try 
>>>> 40.
>>>>
>>>> We'd need someone with a good central location and a bit of power to be
>>>> a
>>>> reliable net control, but it sure seems to me like it could work.
>>>>
>>>> I can do any evening this week, except Thursday or Friday, but after
>>>> that,
>>>> since my teaching semester begins, I'll be limited to week-ends.
>>>>
>>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 7:43 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: bh net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Any band anyone wants to try is great with me, I'll try it if I'm here
>>>>> and
>>>>> able to. I'm curious how 40 would work out.
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 7:24 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: bh net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>    I agree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd suggest giving 40 meters a try for the next go-round if folks are
>>>>>> willing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And, like I said on the round table this evening, this is a great
>>>>>> idea,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> I'll certainly participate as much and as often as I can.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  Kb8TYJ, Big Rapids, MI
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>> From: "Ron & Denise Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 6:14 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: bh net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just for me, 40 meters might be a better overall choice, if we find 
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> frequency without foreign broadcast stations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ron
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Ron & Denise Miller
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 6:12 PM
>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: bh net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm monitoring the net frequency and I'm hearing stations but
>>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> weak,hard to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ron Miller
>>>>>>> N6MSA
>>>>>>> Clearwater, Fl. U.S.A.
>>>>>>> SKYPE arjay1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:41 AM
>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> Subject: bh net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The next blind hams net will be Sunday evening January 04.
>>>>>>> Time 23-00 Z.  Frequency 3830 Lower Sideband.  If this won't work 
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> you,
>>>>>>> start your own net for your area of the world.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2