Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:02:56 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
yep, thus the invention of the rubber duck.
I think there's been a few hams over the years who got tired of breaking
antenna sso they designed the rubber duck which is relatively break proof to
a point.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jennifer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 8:56 AM
Subject: antenna for thf6a
>
> Yes that is the one I am asking about. My concern with that one is when I
> am walking or something if I have it extended I do not want to bang it
> in
> to something and break it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 9:52 AM
> Subject: Re: antenna for thf6a
>
>
>> On Dec 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Jennifer wrote:
>>
>>> The antenna you are talking about is it the tela skopic antenna? If
>>> so how
>>> good does it work. Doe s it work good even when you do not hve it
>>> extended?
>>
>> Of course it doesn't work very well when it isn't extended, at least,
>> not on 440. Physics still apply here, and if the antenna isn't
>> extended, it isn't the correct wavelength and will, therefore, not
>> provide a good match to the transmitter.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1868 - Release Date:
> 12/29/2008 10:48 AM
>
>
|
|
|