BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:02:56 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
yep, thus the invention of the rubber duck.
I think there's been a few hams over the years who got tired of breaking 
antenna sso they designed the rubber duck which is relatively break proof to 
a point.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jennifer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 8:56 AM
Subject: antenna for thf6a


>
> Yes that is the one I am asking about.  My concern with that one is when I
> am walking or something if I have it extended  I do not want to bang  it 
> in
> to something and break it.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 9:52 AM
> Subject: Re: antenna for thf6a
>
>
>> On Dec 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Jennifer wrote:
>>
>>> The antenna you are talking about is it the tela skopic antenna?  If
>>> so how
>>> good does it work.  Doe s it work good even when you do not hve it
>>> extended?
>>
>> Of course it doesn't work very well when it isn't extended, at least,
>> not on 440. Physics still apply here, and if the antenna isn't
>> extended, it isn't the correct wavelength and will, therefore, not
>> provide a good match to the transmitter.
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1868 - Release Date: 
> 12/29/2008 10:48 AM
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2