Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:01:33 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
General Magic |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 30 Jun 98 at 0:07, Felix Hernandez wrote:
> 1. Purchasing a motherboard with a built in SCSI
> a. Does it restrict you from only installing SCSI Hard Drives or
> can you also install an IDE Hard Drive?
Just like installing a SCSI adapter on a card -- you can still also
add IDE devices.
> b. Dual processors, what is the purpose of having dual
> processors and will it increase the performace of a system (running
> graphics applications like games)?
If you run an OS that supports dual processors (NT and most Unix
flavours do, DOS/95/98 don't), two threads may be executing at any
given moment instead of one. This will speed multitasking, or
multithreaded applications.
I don't think many games are significantly multi-threaded, and they
tend to prefer 95/98 over NT, so for *your* intended use, dual
processors would probably be a waste. Multiple processors are a good
way to beef up the computing power on a server.
> 2. Purchasing a Network Card
> a. What information should I look for as far as the performance
> of the card?
If you want to use BNC co-ax instead of CAT5 cable, you probably
have to go 10Mbps to get the co-ax connector.
But 10/100 Mbps cards like the 3Com 3C905TX are only about $50 if
you shop around, so that's what I'd get if you get to choose.
> b. Is the performance of the Network Card as important as the
> performance of the system?
Well, the PCI bus (at 33 MHz) is nominally about 266 Mbps, so
you'd expect to see a difference between a 10 Mbps network and a 100
Mbps one. But I'm not sure you'd notice a performance difference
between different cards running at the same network speed. Quality
and compatibility are likely to be more important than performance.
David G
|
|
|