Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v924) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:11:04 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<op.ucmyz31owc4mme@tengu> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 12 Jun 2008, at 13:44, Robert Kesterson wrote:
> You're right that a dog's natural diet is meat. I just wanted to
> point out that their excitement over a food doesn't necessarily mean
> it's good for them. My dog will excitedly eat just about *anything*
> that I hand to her (she is particularly fond of ice cubes). I think
> they're somewhat like children in that regard (and most adults, for
> that matter) -- if it's interesting or fun to eat, they'll eat it,
> with no regard for whether or not it's good for them.
That's a fair point. I missed a bit out of my story though...
This was from my pre-paleo days when I used to pick up chips and
sausage from the chippie on the way home from work, pretty much every
other day. At first I used to just give the dog a few chips sometimes
(what was I thinking?). After a while I started feeding her bits of
sausage, and that was the end of the chips. From then on she would
roll the chips round in her mouth a bit then spit them out, and sit in
front of me waiting for the real food.
So while I agree there are bad foods (processed ones) that taste nicer
than some good foods, if a bad food hasn't been sweetened and/or
flavoured then decent whole foods usually taste better. I enjoy every
meal I have now, where before quite often meals were disappointing,
boring or downright unpleasant. And that's taking into account the
fact I don't get "treats" like cake after.
Ashley
|
|
|