Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Ray T. Mahorney |
Date: | Sat, 9 May 2009 05:44:25 -0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
that would either be HRO or AES not sure which.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Alawami" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 04:38
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS2000
Yeah I know. But for now it's something until I visit a ham radio store
where I live and I cannot remember what it was called, but there is one.
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 8:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS2000
you'll never get the ham radio feel that way.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Alawami" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS2000
>I don't kknow. I feel for me handheld is the way to go as already I have a
> lot to cary whenb I go everyware I want to be able to maybe contact people
> from Vegas where I live to as far as I can get i9n Nv. Or where ever I
> end
> up in a few months. I could probably for now use Echolink until I'm used
> to
> the feel of the ham radio oiperation proceagures. Thanks all.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:55 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Kenwood TS2000
>
> Portable for what? What bands and modes and power do you want to operate
> portable?
|
|
|