BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:57:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Tom,

Well, you beat me again.  Finished with 90 QSO's in the NAQP, but plan to 
give it a stronger effort in the SSB  portion.  Sorry   we didn't cross 
paths yesterday.

I also found 40 long at  0000utc, but last night didn't seem as noisy as it 
was mid-week.


I'll be there tonight.

73, Steve KW3A
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 11:03 AM
Subject: some thoughts on 40 meters for tonight's blind hams net


> Hi, again, everyone.
>
> Well, yesterday, I did the NAQP CW contest, and found 40 meters to be 
> quite
> long at my location at 0000 Z, or 7 p.m. eastern.
>
> I could hear and work stations in the south and southwest, but not much 
> from
> the east coast.  It also was a bit too early for the far west coast.
>
> So, tonight's net might be challenging.
>
> Wonder if anyone else has had similar experiences with 40 recently at that
> time of the evening, so we know what to expect.
>
> As for the NAQP CW contest itself, mine was a modest effort this year. 
> Made
> 205 contacts, on 20, 40, and 80.  10 and 15 meters were totally shut down 
> at
> this location, so I was limited to those three bands.
>
> I havent' checked my log yet for my total score, but will do so when I get
> some time here, and I will definitely send it in to be counted.
>
> Take care, and will see everyone who can make it on tonight's net.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2