Friday might be workable for me, but truthfully, Sunday would be better 
here too.

Let's see what the others think, especially those who are going to be taking 
the check-ins.

If Friday is best for them, I'd defer to them on that score.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "john vernaleken" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: bh net on 40


> Hello all,
>
> Sunday would be better for me, less hassle from the XYL.
>
> John  KC2QJB
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lloyd Rasmussen" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:12 PM
> Subject: Re: bh net on 40
>
>
>>I can probably make it at that time; this coming Sunday night (local time)
>> would have been better.  I suggest 7195 KHz, because my cursory
>> examination
>> from time to time has not found broadcast stations.  I think that the
>> cut-off for the Advanced license is 7175, but I could be wrong.  But the
>> skip is going to be much longer than it was on 75 meters unless there
>> happens to be a sporadic-E cloud passing overhead.  Skip distance is
>> likely
>> to be at least 700 miles.  My 40 dipole is not quite as effective as the
>> 80,
>> but some of you should be able to hear my 100 watts.
>> 73,
>>
>> Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Kensington, Maryland
>> Home:  http://lras.home.sprynet.com
>> Work:  http://www.loc.gov/nls
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of Steve
>>> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 5:18 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: bh net on 40
>>>
>>> How about 0000Z on Saturday, January 10.  This would be 7PM January 9 in
>>> the
>>> Eastern zone, 6PM Central.  I would be willing to give a shot at running
>>> the
>>> net; I'll have to check the band for a good freq in the General section
>>> away
>>> from foreign broadcasts.
>>>
>>> Steve, K8SP
>>
>