Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:41:25 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi All,
I just found out that I am intolerant to chicken, beef, and pork. I need to
avoid these foods for at least 12 weeks and am looking at different protein
options. I tested ok for venison, duck, goose, and ostrich and also various
fish. With fish I am concerned about mercury or other harmful substances
used on farm raised fish. Which fish would be safe to eat?
Thanks,
Kristina
-----Original Message-----
From: Paleolithic Eating Support List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of William
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 9:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: - Man as old as coal
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:16:25 -0400, Geoffrey Purcell
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> These objects, known as ooparts are on rare occasions validated as
> authentic(such as the Piri Reis map).
> Aside from that, almost every page supporting the oopart-theory re a
> more ancient origin of Mankind, tends to >part of web-archives which
> also focus on Von-Daeniken-esque theories re UFOs etc. - which is not
> exactly >promising.
>>
>> "There was a time when Conrad regarded the integrity of the scientific
>> establishment as beyond reproach. But after seven years of dealing with
>> paleontologists and archaeologists, he said he has found them to be a
>> devious and untrustworthy bunch whose actions in relation to him have
>> been
>> downright dishonest and deceitful."
>>
Is there any evidence that supports a less ancient origin of Man?
I mean other than the claims of the devout and pious paleontologists and
archaeologists.
William
|
|
|