Thanks, Howard!

73 de KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:31 AM
Subject: Fw: Reply to individual posting


> Hey it works!  I replaced the hams address with mine in the to field, and 
> it
> came back alone to me.  Now I am forwarding the message to the list. 
> Really
> a test, but proof is good.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: ">" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 9:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Reply to individual posting
>
>
>>I found my address in the fourth line from the top of the header.  I am
>>sending this to myself, but let me know if it goes to the list to.
>> Just one reply will do, Heck if I get it twice I will know.  Forget the
>> replies.
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 9:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: Reply to individual posting
>>
>>
>>> Okay, here is the old slow reliable way to reply to an individual rather
>>> than to the list.
>>> 1.  Close the message that you want to reply to.
>>> 2.  Right click the message,
>>> 3. arrow up to properties and press enter.
>>> 4.  Choose the details property sheet.
>>> 5.  Now you will find the message displayed, with the sender's e-mail
>>> address near the top of the header information.
>>> 6.  highlight the address, and copy it to the clipboard.
>>> 7.  Press escape to close the properties.
>>> 8.  Press control-n for new message and paste the address from the
>>> clipboard
>>> in the "to field".
>>> 9.  Send as new.
>>> You can also press reply from with in the message, and replace the to
>>> field
>>> from the list, with the individual's address, I think anyway.  But 
>>> except
>>> for the advantage of having their origional message included, I can't 
>>> see
>>> much advantage to it.
>>> This method is off course also useful to make new enteries in your
>>> address
>>> book, and is independant of any screen reader.
>>> I hope this helps.
>>> I also hope it works so I don't klook stupid!
>>>
>>> On a non-related topic, I just worked f5in on 15 meter CW.  RST 589.
>>> This
>>> is the first DX I have heard on 15 meters, that wasn't during a contest.
>>> Cycle 24 must be dawning!!!!
>>
>