Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:59:54 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<4AE971744CE64F20A0218FFEAE4A874D@longlife199547> |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
While modernity's cult of specialization is dear to the heart's of north
Americans, among highly educated peoples of Europe, the Middle and Far East
is bespeaks a paucity of intellectual fortitude. In traditional learned
cultures, one is expected to apply intellectual prowess to far more than
specializations resulting in encapsulated, paradigmatically limiting views.
Furthermore, the career of a Pauling bespeaks of ongoing research
accomplishment.
I didn't know of a set of "paleo rules" - accordingly, there must be a
subset of Paleo oriented persons rendering Paleo compatible with the
ramblings of The Flat Earth Society! Frankly, such a view is intellectual
rubbish, not at all befitting open inquiry and scientific development.
The claim "processed supplements are viewed as non-Paleo" is likewise
rubbish, requiring qualification expressed as "some Paleo adherents
believe..." A cursory review of salient literature invalidates specious
claims implying "all Paleo adherents..." Most likely because Paleo is an
incomplete science as well as beset with a variety of orientations, some
obviously in disagreement while all stimulating to the imaginations of free
thinking people.
|
|
|