>
>Is there any evidence that supports a less ancient origin of Man?
>
>I mean other than the claims of the devout and pious paleontologists and
>archaeologists.
>
>William

I would say that the lack of 60-million-year-old human fossils  is itself  
sufficient evidence that we're not that old as a species.

Geoff

_________________________________________________________________
Could you be the guest MSN Movies presenter? Click Here to Audition 
http://www.lightscameraaudition.co.uk