Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:29:47 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It's my understanding using a tripletalk usb doesn't use as much computer
resources as using two sound cards.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: sound cards
> yeah but the sound card is soooooooooooooooooo much cheaper and sounds
> sooooooooooooo much better since I think that sounds like the doubletalk
> which I never could stand.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 11:05 AM
> Subject: Re: sound cards
>
>
>> That's why I have a tripletalk usb.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:00 AM
>> Subject: Re: sound cards
>>
>>
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> The main advantage to having two sound cards is that you can keep output
>>> from your screen reader separate from other audio output. In a ham
>>> radio
>>> related situation such as listening to packet radio, your screen
>>> reader's
>>> output interferes with decoding if it comes through the same audio path
>>> as
>>> the packet transmission.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:43
>>> Subject: sound cards
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello;
>>>> I can't help asking. What advantages do you find with two sound cards?
>>>> Does it help with anything radio related? I suppose it might help if
>>>> you
>>>> were connecting the pc to your sound system.
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>
>
|
|
|