the answers of what i think about liberals and consevatives and if this is a christian or religous nation is not relevant to what obama is doing to this nation right now. thank you very much. 

we got the government practically owning banks and about to start selling cars. we have a president presiding over more spending and debt than all the presodents from george washington to george bush (w). combinded and not a one of your nor our congressmen and senators knows where the money will come from. we have an attempt going on to subvert the 2nd amemndmant to the constitution as well as the 1st. 

we got the possibility that terrorist are going to get released into this population as a consequence of his being nieve. and yes it can happen. even the democrats in congress balked at this one. 

and i'll end this rant by saying jimmy carter was even more popular after his 1st hundred days that this president. i however do not think this country is in as good of shape as it was to get over obama as it was with carter. 

like i  said my answers to your questions are irrelevant to my dislike of politicians on either side. 

--- On Sat, 5/23/09, Michael H. Collis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Michael H. Collis <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: run across a quote
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 11:48 PM
> Ken, do you think The U.S. government
> is ever right when liberals and/or progressives are in
> power, and ever wrong when conservatives are in
> power?   Do you think we are a "christian"
> nation or a "religious" nation? I find it very ironic that
> the two parties have switched sides in policies so that
> republicans today sound like the democrats of the 19th
> century, and the democrats today sound like the GOP of the
> 19th century.  
> 
> ---- Original message ---- 
> >Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 17:04:48 -0700 
> >From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>   
> >Subject: Re: run across a quote   
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> > 
> >you are damned right it is different. i voted for
> macain too but i do not like him. it is just that i liked
> obama less. like i said he reminded me of jimmy carter and
> in my estimation is following in jimmy's footsteps. bush was
> not my first choice in 2000. he was my last choice. in 2004
> he ran against someone that i think needs to be at the end
> of a rope and not in the U.S. Senate and running for
> president. while putting him on that rope we can put hanoi
> jane fonda on one too. as far as i am concerned there is no
> statute of limitation on treason.    
> > 
> >--- On Sat, 5/23/09, Kendall D. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote: 
> > 
> >> From: Kendall D. Corbett <[log in to unmask]>
> 
> >> Subject: Re: run across a quote 
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> >> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 12:26 PM 
> >> But Ken, 
> >> 
> >> I thought you voted for Bush...or is that
> different than 
> >> liking him?
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go
> here:
> 
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 


      

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy