This won't work for me. I'll not participate. 

Thx, Albert

Sent from my iPhone

On 2011-05-17, at 7:54 AM, Mike Pietruk <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I suspect that the reason Harry suggested using the traditional telephone 
> method was its universality and lack of any learning curve of any sort.
> Personally, I have no interest in what ever is decided as to this for, 
> based on my past experiences with this kind of thing, they tend to be 
> free-for-alls more than anything else as everyone ends up stepping 
> on everyone else's conversation.  That's the real beauty of email 
> discussions as one has an opportunity to think before speaking, what is 
> said can be easily reviewed, and the nuggets of info gathered can easily 
> be saved for later review.
> Trying to establish a time that works for most folks ends up being a major 
> challenge in and of itself.
> Email discussions don't have this impediment.  
> 
> 
> 
> everyone feels the pain of God's absence until they find him.
> James MacDonald, speaker, "Walk in the Word" radio
> http://www.jamesmacdonald.com/
> 
> 
>    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> Archived on the World Wide Web at
>    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
>    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
>    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]