Thanks for that advice Gale. I am asuming for now that the absence of hunger 
or cravings means that I am getting sufficient nutrients, perhaps for the 
first time in ages. Although I mainly eat grass fed lamb or kangaroo meat 
I'm pretty sure that their current EFA profile is lower than wild game in 
paleolithic times. There are a plethora of dietary experts out there but at 
the end of the day as you suggest it is better to listen my body and blood 
sugar readings and not get confused by the 'science'.

Leonie


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gale" .

  The only logical thing to do (in my mind) is to start with a theoretical 
paleo diet (theoretical because there is no way of knowing precisely what a 
paleo diet would be and, if we could know it, not likely having the ability 
to faithfully reproduce it) and add items like PUFAs measuring your 
individual response.  Assuming that something cannot be healthy for you 
because it didn't exist in paleolithic times is as unsound as animal rights 
people assuming that meat cannot be good for them - because they want it to 
be so.