PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:42:41 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Very very high cholesterol is strongly linked to heart disease. What has not
been shown is that normal but higher range cholesterol has any strong link
to disease.

I think docotrs like cholesterol because it gives them some solid number
they can work with, and the theory does make sense.

On Nov 29, 2007 1:02 AM, Brenda Young <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I still don't understand what the big deal is about cholesterol, I really
> don't.  It has not been proven to cause any kinds of problems except by the,
> um, drug companies.  Cholesterol is a hormone and it needs to be in balance,
> yes, same with estrogen and progesterone, and not just in women.  All
> hormones are necessary, so why do people fall for this sh*t???  I don't get
> it.
>
>  Love,
>  Bren
>
>
>
> Kathryn Rosenthal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  Meta-analysis says low LDL cholesterol may be associated with greater
> risk of cancer
> Janice Hopkins Tanne
>
> New York
>
> The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
>
>
> Patients with low concentrations of low density lipoprotein (LDL)
> cholesterol, lowered as a result of taking statins, are at significantly
> more risk of being diagnosed as having cancer compared with patients with
> higher concentrations of the cholesterol, according to a meta-analysis of 23
> large studies of statins (Journalof the American College of Cardiology
> 2007;5:409-18).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Sorry, I can't cite the full text of this article....it requires a
> subscription/payment. But... I find the idea of interest because I have read
> some good, current research the last few yrs. re. the lack of vit. D in
> women and the presence of breast cancer.
>
> So, if we accept that we convert sunlight to vit. D only if we have
> sufficient cholesterol in our bodies and that low cholesterol would mean low
> vit. D absorption, we can see why low LDL may contribute to cancer. I don't
> know if the article states anything re. cholesterol that is low naturally,
> i.e. without statin use.
>
> Kath
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try
> it now.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2