I was not aware of that, ken, as it is now a moot point with edwards out of the race. BUT to answer the question, NO, it's not ok to bribe her silence, with or without campaign money. Maybe she saw an opportunity to make some cash and he fell for the act. I have not paid attention to EDWARDS in over a year. It is disappointing. Most politicians will let us down in the ethics department.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.zazzle.com/TamarMag*
Tamar Mag Raine
[log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
----- Original Message ----
From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
To: Tamar Raine <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2008 8:57:53 PM
Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
so are you okay with a man humping a campaign worker while his wife is fighting for her life against cancer? and i'd like a little bit of a clear explaination of just whose money he was using to pay her 3000 dollars a month to have her quiet. i'd certainly think that campaign contributors just might be equally as curious.
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Tamar Raine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Tamar Raine <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 11:51 PM
> i don't think an affair breaks my belief in a public
> offical. For instance, if Clinton had just said, Yes, I
> had an affair with Lewinsky, that would not have broken my
> trust in him. Big deal, whoopie do. but the fact that he
> lied about it was stupid. I was much more concerned about
> Bosnia, about NAFTA, and why was he going so far to the
> right........
>
> what would do it for me would be if they were abusing
> power, if they were unethical, if there were secret
> dealings. For instance if Obama was part of the chicago
> political machine, I am sure I could dig up the dirt on the
> web.
>
> Mag
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> http://www.zazzle.com/TamarMag*
> Tamar Mag Raine
> [log in to unmask]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2008 6:11:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
>
> yeah, Edwards is a great example. this had been going on
> for months and months. the inquirer said the had it for
> months and did not publish it until he was out of the
> running.
> who broke the story? ABC? NBC? CBS? CNN? NO NO NO AND NO.
> THE NEW YORK TIMES? THE WASHINGTON POST? CHICAGO TIMES? LA
> TIMES? ATLASNTA URINAL AND CONSTIPATION? WELL NO!!
> right next to the lady who had a 300 ponnd baby fathered by
> an alien from mars in the national inquirer was where it
> was.
>
> now the NY times ran an article about McCain on a rumor and
> an enuendo. well i can see where you might think they are
> impartial, but it just don't quite wash with little ole
> me.
>
> thank you for giving me a prime example.
>
>
> --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Kathy <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Kathy <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 7:18 PM
> > I think he's saying the press is too liberal to
> really
> > dig up dirt
> > against Obama. I beg to differ. If The Enquirer
> had been
> > able to dig
> > up dirt against him they would have. Just look at
> John
> > Edwards.
> >
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go
> here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
