BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:20:37 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Howard,

I agree, but some people on this list get very upset at the idea of using 
Echolink even though it's the most sensible approach for what we're trying 
to do.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 04:26
Subject: Re: schedule


> With this amount of interest in talking to each other, why not do an echo
> link conference?  I see they have conferrences up to 500 people.  That 
> aught
> to be enough.  No issues with propigation, location, or having antennas or
> HF privilleges.  Since we seem reluctant to make schedules that exclude
> areas of the country, let's bend over, hold our ankles, and actually talk 
> to
> each other.  No qrm, no qrn, no foreign broadcast.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2