BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:04:12 -0600
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
From:
Gale Conard <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Thanks for the correction on the web address, collin.  I should have 
proofread it more carefully.

Yes, the two center wires are left open.  Those same wires are cut off a 
couple of inches above the 44 foot flattop.  (I should say: the 22 foot 
arms.)  Those couple of inches are used to suspend the center

I think the configuration of the antenna is quite flexible, since it is not 
intended to be resonant at any particular frequency.  For the same reason, 
the measurements are not cut in stone.

As far as I know, "dipole" and "doublet" are interchangeable terms. 
However, there seems to be a tendency to call a resonant, center fed antenna 
a "dipole", and a less resonant one a "doublet".

I can see the emails piling up on that one.

73,
Gale
[log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2