VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christopher Chaltain <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Christopher Chaltain <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:26:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
I agree, although systems may still fail even if you're good about 
powering them off when they aren't in use.

Some may quibble over how much Ford and other companies are actually 
saving, but I think it's a no brainer that savings can be made, both in 
power consumption and life expectancy, when systems that aren't needed 
are powered off. I actually think the cost is a bit more incideous to 
track. How much is spent when a key systemneeds to be accessed during 
off hours, and someone needs to go in to physically bring it up or the 
infrastructure needs to be put in place to allow for the remote powering 
up of a system. Also, with work being done around the bglobe and aroudn 
the clock, the number of "off hours" is always shrinking. IMHO, powering 
off systems you don't need is important, but even greater savings can be 
made when systems autonomically power themselves off or throttle down 
their power usage when they aren't busy.

BTW, how is this related to the blind or the visually impaired, at least 
more so than any other computer user?

--

Christopher
[log in to unmask]


On 3/24/2010 12:16 PM, Sun Sounds of Arizona wrote:
> Actually, I've always done this both personally and in my organization. Not
> only do you save power costs, but you save wear and tear on the moving parts
> like the power supply and mother board fans, as well as the hard drives.
> Powering up takes far les power than keeping something running endlessly. If
> the computers are on proper surge protection, then you risk nothing from the
> power on surge either.  I can make computers last far beyond there normal
> useful life this way. When I discard a machine it is because it is obsolete,
> never because it has failed.  They just don't fail if you shut them down
> over night and on weekends.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Poehlman
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:34 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [VICUG-L] Turning Off Computers
>
> interesting but I wonder how much it costs to power up all those systems and
> what it costs in life of the systems.
>
>
>      VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> Archived on the World Wide Web at
>      http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
>      Signoff: [log in to unmask]
>      Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>      VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> Archived on the World Wide Web at
>      http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
>      Signoff: [log in to unmask]
>      Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
>    


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2