Hi to all.

As a person who has been keeping tabs on the Internet radio industry, I do not find Ms. Peters' testimony to be very surprising. With the exception of making NLS materials available to the visually impaired online, she has consistently sided with rights holders over the community interest.

Ted

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKN1039015420090910

US Copyright Office opposes Google book settlement
Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:45pm BST
By Diane Bartz

WASHINGTON, Sept 10 (Reuters) - Google Inc's (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile, Research) plan to digitize millions of books as part of a class action settlement wrongly creates a virtually compulsory license for books, the U.S. register of copyrights said on Thursday.

In a hearing called to discuss a 2008 settlement between the Authors Guild and Google to allow Google to digitize entire libraries, Marybeth Peters said that the Copyright Office originally viewed the agreement as positive but soon shifted its view because the class action settlement covered future behavior instead of just redressing past actions.

"The settlement would alter the landscape of copyright law," she told the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee.

Peters objected to the settlement on the grounds that the class would affect authors in this country and overseas whose works are in copyright.

"The settlement would bind authors, publishers, their heirs and successors to these rules, even though Google has not yet scanned and may never scan their works," Peters said in her written testimony.

Peters argued that Google would inappropriately be allowed to put out-of-print books on Google Books without seeking permission from the rights holders.

For Google to show entire books without permission is "indisputably an act of copyright infringement," she said.

Peters also argued that non-U.S. authors were included in the class, sometimes because one copy of a book was in a research library. Germany and France oppose the proposed settlement.

In his testimony, Google's top legal officer David Drummond said Google was "fully compliant with copyright law," and access to online books could revolutionize research for students who live far from major libraries or have physical disabilities.

Google's plan to scan entire research libraries prompted a 2005 lawsuit filed by the Authors Guild, accusing Google of copyright infringement. A proposed settlement to resolve the lawsuit will be discussed on Oct. 7 in Manhattan federal court.

Rival companies, privacy advocates and some libraries and small publishers, have accused Google of violating antitrust law to dominate the digital book market. The Justice Department is looking into their concerns.

The case is Authors Guild et al v Google Inc 05-08136 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan) (Reporting by Diane Bartz, editing by Gerald E. McCormick) 


© Thomson Reuters 2009. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.

Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]