Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:04:47 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<89BDB7E2C0364BB78FBD8BFF74659ABA@patotc9mn5sam2> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Agreed, but many hold the view. Which is why I humbly suggest reading this fantastic book.
Cheers.
Jim
On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Pat Barrett wrote:
> OMG, how can science "disprove" religion? That is utter nonsense.
> Pat Barrett [log in to unmask]
> http://ideas.lang-learn.us/barrett.php
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: R: [PALEOFOOD] R: [PALEOFOOD] R: [PALEOFOOD] Keith Massey
>
>
>> Again, I wish I could force everyone to read _The Reason for God_ by Timothy Keller. Believer or no, you are seriously shortchanging your education if you haven't picked up a copy. It's that good.
>> Part of a starred review by Booklist: "*The claim that science has disproved religion comes in for particular scrutiny, as Keller deflects the antireligious syllogism that converts evolutionary theory into an obituary for orthodoxy..... Readers expecting Keller to deliver the usual pious bromides may experience a profound shock to their spiritual and social complacency. --Bryce Christensen"
>> Now can we get back to paleo?
>> Jim Swayze
>> www.fireholecanyon.com
>>
|
|
|