BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: from Jennifer the G5RV Vs. Windom Continued
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:37:56 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (9 lines) 
Well height isn't bad, but really, a half wave above ground is what is 
suggested, and that isn't going to happen very likely, so I wouldn't waste 
a lot of time and energy worrying about a little extra height.  Should 
work just fine.  Also, it depends on where the actual rf or earth ground 
is at your qth, all kinds of variables.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2