BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:24:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
    Well, Steve, it's worth a try, if I can get the time and the help to do 
so.

Will keep you posted, and will try somehow to get on 160 this winter.

I thought of maybe trying to manually tune the Windom on 160, but the 
analyzer says the SWR is so far up there that manual tuning  probably 
wouldn't be effective either.

Oh well, we'll keep thinking on it here.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: Windom


> Hi Tom,
>
> Congrats on the new one.   For 160, maybe the fastest and least trouble
> would be to replace the  existing 80/40 dipole with a shortened (loaded)
> dipole for 160.   You could also go vertical, but that would require a
> ground system.  An inverted L  needs about 130 feet of wire, part of which
> is vertical and the rest horizontal.   If your tower is 50 feet high,  you
> have the vertical  part of the antenna  held off your tower  and then the
> remaining 80 feet runs horiz. to a tree or something.   Feedpoint is at
> ground level and again, you need a radial system.
>
> Do a google search for 160 meter antennas, and you will find a bunch. 
> You
> can homebrew a shortened vertical, but once again will need a ground 
> system.
> Look for you on 160 this winter.
>
> I think a few years ago Phil from this list posted  his homebrew 160 vert.
> I may be wrong about that, but maybe he can  chime in on this.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 7:20 PM
> Subject: Windom
>
>
>> Hello all.
>>
>> Well, this past week-end, we finally got my new Windom up.
>>
>> However, there's one small bummer.
>>
>> We couldn't do the large 160-meter version, simply because my property 
>> was
>> not big enough to accommodate it.  So, I now have an 80-meter Windom.
>>
>> It's approximately 125 feet long--80 feet to the south, and 45 feet to 
>> the
>> north.  The center is mounted to my tower, with each leg mounted to
>> conveniently-located trees.  The center, and the legs are basically about
>> 35
>> feet up.
>>
>> The antenna tunes with the auto-tuner in the TS480 on 80, 40, 20, 17, 15,
>> and 10 meters.
>>
>> It doesn't tune on 30 meters, which doesn't surprise me.
>>
>> I haven't tried the 60 meter freqs yet, so will let everyone know how 
>> that
>> is.
>>
>> So, I guess I'll have to wait to somehow get on 160 meters some other
>> Winter.
>>
>> But you know what they say:  Any antenna is a compromise, and at least 
>> I'm
>> now in better shape on some of the bands than I was before.
>>
>> If anyone has any neat ideas for getting on 160, let me know.
>>
>> My hf antennas are now the new Windom, an old 80/40 meter dipole that
>> doesn't work too well, and my KLM tri-bander for 10, 15, and 20.
>>
>> 73 from Tom behler:  KB8TYJ
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2