Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 1997 07:20:35 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dean:
>In the articles I quoted, Stefansson was quite clear in saying that in his
>year-long experiment with his buddy, they were mostly eating regular chops
>and steaks from standard cattle. Mostly they chose high-quality cuts,
>which of course would mean they were fairly fatty. The two test subjects
>were allowed to have the food cooked however they liked. One of them
>preferred his very rare while the other preferred it fairly well done.
>(Interestingly, one had his cholesterol go up slightly while the other did
>not; I wonder if the rareness of the meat had anything to do with it?)
<snip>
Absolutely facinating! How did I ever think it was all-raw? I assume he was
eating raw when living "on the Eskimo" diet during his travels and
explorations.
Anyway, this is a big bombshell to me, that he was cooking it and not using
organs much if at all over the long-term. I'm taken aback, as they say ;)
Thanks for the detail and I hope you do get the articles on the web one day!
Could I crosspost your summary to the raw-food list?
Cheers,
Kirt
Kirt Nieft / Melisa Secola
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|