BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:17:11 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2691 bytes) , text/plain (159 bytes)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You better be certain that the SMA connecter will hold that weight!


  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: T Behler=20
  To: [log in to unmask]
  Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 6:14 PM
  Subject: Re: antenna for thf6a


      Wow, Buddy. ... That's great.

  I may just order one of them someday here if I get the extra bucks.

  73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
  To: <[log in to unmask]>
  Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 6:04 PM
  Subject: Re: antenna for thf6a


  > On Dec 29, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Lou Kolb Gmail POP account wrote:
  >=20
  >> Any suggestions on a good replacement antenna for the one that =
comes =20
  >> with
  >> the Kenwood Th-f6a?
  >=20
  > As a matter of fact, yes. I bought one of these and it's great:
  >=20
  > http://www.smileyantenna.com/product_info.php?products_id=3D55
  >=20
  > Telescopic antenna. Think it's 1/4 wave on 440 collapsed, pull up =
two =20
  > sections and it's a 5/8 wave on 440, put up all but two and it's a =
5/8 =20
  > wave on 220. Or maybe it's all but three up, I can't recall. 1/4 =
wave =20
  > on 2 meters fully extended.
  >=20
  > Now before people spaz about a telescoping antenna on an HT with an  =

  > SMA connector, let me put your fears at bay. Collapsed, this antenna =
=20
  > is all of six inches long, and some of this is taken up with a nice  =

  > spring at the bottom that takes some of the impact and flexing and =
so =20
  > forth so all the weight isn't right on the connector. Because of =
this =20
  > spring, you're also not going to have the problems associated with a =
=20
  > solid antenna on your belt. It really is the best of both worlds, =
IMO, =20
  > and the price is right at only around $20.
  >=20
  > For perspective, I replaced an extended "flexible" antenna with one =
of =20
  > these. Think it was the Maldal one. Anyway, the SMA on it was just =20
  > bare, no seal, no nothing, and I managed to break two SMA connectors =
=20
  > on the HT with this antenna. I don't feel at all uncomfortable with  =

  > the Smiley antenna though. It's got a sealed connector and, as I =
said, =20
  > the connector doesn't have a lot of weight sitting right on it.
  > --
  > Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
  > Phone: (814) 746-4127 or 888-75-BUDDY
  > Create your own economic stimulus package:
  > http://www.powermall.info
  >


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com=20
  Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1868 - Release Date: =
12/29/2008 10:48 AM




No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1868 - Release Date: 12/29/2008 10:48 AM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2