Marilyn Harris wrote:
>> I see it the opposite way - we have not evolved to eat anything
>> other than what our paleolithic ancestors ate.
> 
>> So there has been no evolution for ~100,000 years, and before that
>>  there's no evidence, no proof, just speculation.
> 
> Of what relevance is it to us what our "paleolithic ancestors" ate,
> if you think there is no evolution (in other words, according to you,
> we wouldn't have paleolithic ancestors)?  So who are these
> "paleolithic ancestors" that you mention above? How do you see them
> being connected to us?
> 
> Marilyn
> 
> 

?  Definition of the word: A gradual process in which something changes
into a different and usually more complex or better form.

IMO there has been no change in our species except for those caused by
malnutrition and environmental changes, nor has anyone shown that there
ever was any change.

It follows that we if we enjoyed the same diet and environment as our
paleolithic ancestors for enough generations we would be physically
identical to them. The improvement in health resulting from eating what 
we think is their diet is evidence in support of this.

Environment is n-dimensional.

William