if he is presumed innocent, why then all the wringging of
 hands on the left becouse ubl has not been killed by the
 bush admin?
 
 what if he pleads insanity? someone has to be crazy to do
 what he has done.
 
 what if he gets off on a technicallity? 
 
 --- On Wed, 6/18/08, Kendall D. Corbett
 [log in to unmask]> wrote:
 > > From: Kendall D. Corbett
 <[log in to unmask]>
 > Subject: Re: [C-PALSY] Sartre's Coffee :-) now ubl
 in court
 > To: [log in to unmask]
 > Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 2:37 PM
 > I think so; if we assume anyone is guilty before they
 are
 > proven guilty,
 > what stops us from doing that with everyone?  In
 UBL's
 > case, the evidence is
 > pretty overwhelming, so that won't be a problem. 
 Some
 > may view it as a
 > waste of time, but I'm with Justice Holmes on this
 one:
 >  "It is better that
 > 100 guilty men go free than 1 innocent man go to
 prison.
 > 
 > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:28 PM, ken barber
 > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 > 
 > > good comeback, kendall.
 > >
 > > on a more serious point, in view of last weeks
 supream
 > court decision
 > >
 > > if ubl is captured and is given a trail, do we
 > consider him innocent until
 > >  proven guilty?
 > >
 > >
 


      

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy