Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:06:31 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Geoff,
As pointed out by V. Stefansson, the Inuit developed apparently simple
technologies for surviving in very hostile climates that were extremely
effective. European/southern explorers and adventurers who arrived in
those same environments often succumbed to the weather conditions,
never to be heard from again. Those who did survive to tell their
stories were, very frequently, the beneficiaries of the magnanimity of
these "stagnated" people. From clothing design to construction
techniques for temporary and more enduring domiciles, the Inuit
reflected an astounding grasp of heat conservation/loss and transfer.
They were well ahead of "civilized" engineering in these areas until
well into the Twentieth Century. Even then, with comparatively enormous
resources at their disposal, people from the south failed to devise
clothing or shelters that were anywhere near as comfortable or gentle on
the fragile environments where the Inuit survived and thrived.
Perhaps you meant no harm, but the perpetuation of such unfounded
stereotypes is most offensive.
Ron Hoggan
Geoffrey Purcell wrote:
>
> Please ignore William's comments. He's unaware of history which shows grain-eating Babylonians/Ancient Egyptians/Sumerians/Dark-Age Muslims etc. creating great, advanced cultures/civilisations while all-animal-food-eating Inuit didn't do much by comparison in the meantime, just stagnated really.
>
>
--
PK
|
|
|