PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A400)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Date:
Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:48:57 -0500
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Back to PALEO!
From:
Jim Swayze <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<op.uy6h870iwc4mme@titan>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
I respectfully disagree. It is probably true that, as bad as they are,  
sugar and milk are better for you than the cocoa.  Our curious  
fascination with this very nonpaleo substance baffles me.

Jim Swayze
www.fireholecanyon.com
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>  
wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:26:53 -0500, Kat T <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> By the way, as of this morning, I have lost 9 pounds in the past 12  
>> days on PALEO.
>
> Congratulations.  :-)
>
>> I have only 'cheated' a few times with rice bread and a piece of
>> chocolate :)
>
> Chocolate is OK -- it's the milk and sugar they mix it with that is  
> the problem.
>
> -- 
>  Robert Kesterson
>  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2