BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:05:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that, and 
some others I know but I know not all.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.


> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power down to
> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly, if
> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
> thanks in advance.
>
> -- 
> Shaun
> web sites:
> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
> skype: brailledude
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2